Business & Complex Litigation

• Unfair Competition: Fending off the Competitor’s Legal Action

  We defeated an attempt by a competing restaurant franchise to use legal tactics to obtain proprietary information. A prominent chain of restaurants believed our client, a competing restaurant chain, had…
  Read More »

  Unfair Competition: Fending off the Competitor’s Legal Action
  We defeated an attempt by a competing restaurant franchise to use legal tactics to obtain proprietary information. A prominent chain of restaurants believed our client, a competing restaurant chain, had stolen its restaurant concept, including its recipes, design and layout. In an unusual tactic, the complaining company asked the court for permission to take a deposition of a witness before even filing a lawsuit -- a pre-action deposition. We knew that the competitor’s real intent was to poke around in our client’s operations and get company secrets, by claiming secrets had been stolen from them. Our legal battle over this issue was so vigorous that the competing company gave up and walked away from its legal action against our client.

• Fraud & Civil Rico: Trial Victory

  Hired on the eve of trial, we succeeded in getting all fraud and racketeering charges dismissed against an international franchisor and its CEO. A nationally known Washington DC attorney, who is a crusader…
  Read More »

  Fraud & Civil Rico: Trial Victory
  

  Hired on the eve of trial, we succeeded in getting all fraud and racketeering charges dismissed against an international franchisor and its CEO. A nationally known Washington DC attorney, who is a crusader for franchisees, targeted our client, a leader in its particular segment of an industry. The case was litigated for a number of years during which Plaintiffs pursued Civil RICO (racketeering) and fraud claims against the franchisor. The allegations involved the franchisor's sales practices used in persuading individuals to buy a retail store franchise. Not only were the Plaintiffs seeking a multi-million dollar award, the Federal Trade Commission was monitoring the case regarding the sales practices allegations.

  Quadrino Schwartz was hired to take over the case and conduct the trial. In a mere six weeks, we developed a strategy for the trial and briefed all of the complex legal issues under federal RICO and Georgia law. We conducted a two-week trial in federal court in which we took apart the Plaintiff's case and their experts and obtained a verdict completely absolving our clients -- the CEO and the entire company -- of all liability. The jury found no evidence of fraud or racketeering, and the complaint was dismissed.

• Fraud & Breach of Contract:  Business Breakup

  We completely removed our client from a complex, lengthy trial when a former partner destroyed evidence that made a fair trial impossible. Our client, a CPA and a lawyer, was sued for fraud and theft in…
  Read More »

  Fraud & Breach of Contract:  Business Breakup
  We completely removed our client from a complex, lengthy trial when a former partner destroyed evidence that made a fair trial impossible. Our client, a CPA and a lawyer, was sued for fraud and theft in connection with a failed business relationship. During the lawsuit, it was learned that the plaintiff deleted financial information from the company's computer system that we believed was crucial to our client's defense.

  We successfully convinced the court that our client would never be able to get a fair trial because of the destroyed evidence. With the jury ready to hear opening statements, the judge dismissed our client from the case, while all of the other parties proceeded through a lengthy trial.

• Fraud Case Against an Attorney: Verdict Dismissing the Case

  An attorney sought Quadrino Schwartz to conduct a trial against him in which he was accused of engaging in a fraudulent real estate scheme. From the beginning, he had handled the case himself, but when…
  Read More »

  Fraud Case Against an Attorney: Verdict Dismissing the Case
  An attorney sought Quadrino Schwartz to conduct a trial against him in which he was accused of engaging in a fraudulent real estate scheme. From the beginning, he had handled the case himself, but when it came to the trial, he wanted Richard Quadrino.

  There were several experts, mortgage brokers, and other lawyers as witnesses. After evaluating the cast of characters and the nature of the case, Quadrino first decided that the case was better evaluated by a judge, rather than a jury. He successfully switched tactics, late in the game, and got the case to be heard by a judge.

  After filing a persuasive legal brief prepared by the team members at Quadrino Schwartz, Mr. Quadrino set out to dismantle the case against his client. Through various techniques he was able to convince the judge that the entire case needed to be thrown out. The judge wrote an opinion that was featured on the front page of the New York Law Journal.

• Damages Obtained for Franchisor

  After obtaining summary judgment for an international franchisor client, we took the damages phase to trial. Partner Richard Quadrino conducted the trial. The Defendant raised numerous legal issues that…
  Read More »

  Damages Obtained for Franchisor
  After obtaining summary judgment for an international franchisor client, we took the damages phase to trial. Partner Richard Quadrino conducted the trial.

  The Defendant raised numerous legal issues that he contended precluded an award of damages. Quadrino successfully fought back on the legal issues, effectively cross examined the Defendant, discredited the accounting tabulations by the adversary, and convinced the federal judge to award all of the damages sought by our client.

• Shareholder Breakup: Fair Share Obtained in Buyout

  In the middle of a lengthy litigation regarding the breakup of surgeons in their practice, one of the doctors discharged his lawyer and hired Quadrino Schwartz. Our client's former partners claimed that…
  Read More »

  Shareholder Breakup: Fair Share Obtained in Buyout
  In the middle of a lengthy litigation regarding the breakup of surgeons in their practice, one of the doctors discharged his lawyer and hired Quadrino Schwartz.

  Our client's former partners claimed that there was no dollar value to his interest in the surgical practice. Partner Richard Quadrino vigorously pursued the case, reconstructing computer records from years earlier, showing the value of the receivables due to the practice at the time of the client's departure. He also demonstrated to the court that the other side was hiding information that was critical to the case.

  After a few extended battles, Mr. Quadrino convinced the attorneys for the other doctors to recommend a large settlement. They agreed, paying our client hundreds of thousands of dollars for the buyout of his interest in the company.

• Commercial Real Estate Settlement:  The Case That Could Not Be Settled

  After battling for years -- with each side calling the police on the other -- we were retained in a hotly contested dispute between partners who owned a commercial building together. Numerous financial…
  Read More »

  Commercial Real Estate Settlement:  The Case That Could Not Be Settled
  After battling for years -- with each side calling the police on the other -- we were retained in a hotly contested dispute between partners who owned a commercial building together.

  Numerous financial issues existed, as well as disputes as to the relative value of the interests of the parties in the entity that owned the building. Making matters worse, our client was a tenant of his partner and landlord tenant issues were also being litigated. Fraud was alleged against our client, and the tempers ran high -- all the time.

  Despite the intractability of the parties and the other lawyer, our team succeeded in obtaining a very good result for the client. We "locked the door" in a marathon mediation session (8 hours) and got it done. Case closed.

• LLC Buyout Litigation:  Favorable Settlement

  We were hired to obtain a fair buyout of our client's share in an LLC and a related corporation in which he had a one third interest. His former partners were refusing to place any value on either interest.…
  Read More »

  LLC Buyout Litigation:  Favorable Settlement
  We were hired to obtain a fair buyout of our client's share in an LLC and a related corporation in which he had a one third interest. His former partners were refusing to place any value on either interest.

  Our client, a surgeon, had started up an ambulatory surgical center and helped grow the surgical practice, we had been converted into an LLC by a prior attorney. When he departed the two entites and the other partners refused to buy him out, we commenced both a shareholder derivative lawsuit and a case for a buyout of the client's interest in the LLC.

  Partners Quadrino and O'Mahony litigated the cases as a team. We identified loopholes in the LLC law that have yet to be addressed by any court in New York state. The issues regarding the loopholes and the factual contentions regarding our client's reason for departing were all in great dispute.

  After a series of battles, the law firm on the other side was fired and a new firm was brought in. After battling with the new firm and conducting two mediations, we succeeded in obtaining a very sizable recovery for our client.

• Toxic Waste:  Product Liability

  We protected our client,a manufacturer of measuring equipment, from being a part of a large lawsuit when others were to blame for a toxic spill. When an oil delivery company overfilled an oil tank at a…
  Read More »

  Toxic Waste:  Product Liability
  We protected our client,a manufacturer of measuring equipment, from being a part of a large lawsuit when others were to blame for a toxic spill.

  When an oil delivery company overfilled an oil tank at a local school, an enormous spill ensued, causing substantial toxic contamination, which spread to a local inlet and bay. Our client manufactured the gauge located inside the oil tank that indicates the level of oil contained in the tank. The school district sued our client, the oil delivery company, and the engineering firm that designed the area surrounding the oil tank. We demonstrated to the school district that our client’s gauge was fully operational and that the other parties were negligent, resulting in a very favorable settlement for our client.

• Partership Litigation:  Recusal of Judge

  We protected our client when his ex-partner's best friend was the only judge in the county. All politics are local, and sometimes politics gets in the way of fairness. We were called in to handle a partnership…
  Read More »

  Partership Litigation:  Recusal of Judge
  We protected our client when his ex-partner's best friend was the only judge in the county.

  All politics are local, and sometimes politics gets in the way of fairness. We were called in to handle a partnership dispute concerning the ownership of two upstate New York diners and joint property holdings. The case was before a powerful judge who was allied with our client’s former partner. No attorney in this upstate county would represent him, fearing future repercussions from the judge.

  Our client was on the verge of having his business shut down. We stepped in with an aggressive litigation strategy, commenced by bringing a motion to have the judge disqualified from the case. The motion succeeded, saving our client’s business. We subsequently obtained a favorable settlement for the client after obtaining a level playing field.

• Seizure of Assets—TRO Dissolved

  We proved to a federal judge that her order to freeze our client's assets was wrong, and succeeded in having her immediately vacate the order. Our client was sued by a group of nationally known insurance…
  Read More »

  Seizure of Assets—TRO Dissolved
  We proved to a federal judge that her order to freeze our client's assets was wrong, and succeeded in having her immediately vacate the order.

  Our client was sued by a group of nationally known insurance companies for fraud and racketeering. At the very beginning of the lawsuit, without notifying any of the other parties in the proceedings, the insurance companies convinced a federal judge to freeze our client’s assets. This action could have destroyed his business.

  We were in court the very next day to vigorously challenge both the insurance company and the judge, knowing that our adversaries had taken this action without good reason.

  Even when the federal judge told us that she would not change her mind the day after issuing this order, we knew we were right - - and we succeeded in defending our client. We convinced the judge to change her ruling and she lifted the freeze that same day, freeing millions of dollars for our client and allowing his business to continue its normal operations.

• Real Estate Litigation:  Motion to Dismiss Granted

  We prevented a harassment lawsuit from being used to halt a successful real estate sale. A real estate developer purchased an old house in an exclusive neighborhood with the intention of knocking it down…
  Read More »

  Real Estate Litigation:  Motion to Dismiss Granted
  We prevented a harassment lawsuit from being used to halt a successful real estate sale.

  A real estate developer purchased an old house in an exclusive neighborhood with the intention of knocking it down and building a new home. The closing was halted when it was discovered that a neighbor had filed a last-minute lawsuit to stop the transaction. The neighbor had signed an informal agreement with the previous owner - and was now seeking to take over the property. We immediately filed an extensive motion to dismiss the case and the court granted the motion, allowing the real estate transaction to proceed.

• Tax Litigation

  We stopped a town from imposing an unlawful tax on our client, a townhouse community. A large townhouse community on Long Island discovered that the town was charging it thousands of dollars for refuse…
  Read More »

  Tax Litigation
  We stopped a town from imposing an unlawful tax on our client, a townhouse community. A large townhouse community on Long Island discovered that the town was charging it thousands of dollars for refuse collection services that the townhouse community could not use. When the discrepancy was brought to the town's attention, it refused to stop charging the tax. The development was paying for a private carting company and paying additional money every year to the town for a service it didn’t get and didn’t want.

  The community lodged a formal protest, but the town refused to stop collecting the tax. We prosecuted a lawsuit and won. Our client no longer pays taxes on services it doesn’t use, and the town was ordered to pay a substantial tax refund.