Bruce Barket was brought in to conduct the trial. He sized up the legal claims and the evidence, shifted the strategy previously employed by other lawyers, and cleared through the brush of legal issues and distractions. After re-arranging the legal claims, he proceeded to trial.
While the evidence revealed that the client did indeed vote for legislation favored by those who paid him campaign contributions, Barket's cross examination of the Defendant and other tactics employed by him persuaded the jury to vote in the client's favor, declaring that he was defamed by false statements. The case then settled for an undisclosed sum.